Monday, March 29, 2010

Blowing Hot Air:

It’s time to determine who is for real and who in the political landscape is blowing hot air.

Let’s take a Congressman. He is from a very conservative district. His constituents are for less government, pro-life and most definitely pro-second amendment.

The congressman goes to Washington DC. He is asked to vote on an abortion bill.

He said he would vote no and votes no on that bill.

The bill passes.


The next bill that he is asked to vote on is gun control.

He said he opposes gun control and votes no on that bill.

It passes.

The Congressman in question goes home and tells his constituents that if only we had a few more “conservatives” like him in office we could have stopped those bills from being passed.

What said Congressman neglects to tell his sheep is that both of those bills need to be funded. Both bills become part of the Federal Budget. He votes for the Federal Budget.

That means that he voted to fund what he said he was against, abortion and gun control.

Nice trick.

If this bill is passed will it increase the Size, Cost, extend the Reach or Power of the government? If the bill does any of those things he will vote no on that bill for those reasons.

Tuesday, March 9, 2010

The Percentage Of Presidential Cabinet Members Who Are From Private Enterprise.

The percentage of each past president's cabinet who had worked in the private business sector prior to their appointment to
the cabinet. You know what the private business sector is...a real life business, not a government job. Here are the percentages.


T. Roosevelt........38%
Taft................... 40%
Wilson .............. 52%
Harding.............. 49%
Coolidge.............48%
Hoover............... 42%
F. Roosevelt....... 50%
Truman.............. 50%
Eisenhower..........57%
Kennedy............ 30%
Johnson.............. 47%
Nixon................ 53%
Ford.................. 42%
Carter............... 32%
Reagan............. 56%
G H Bush............51%
Clinton ............. 39%
G W Bush........... 55%

And the winner of the Chicken Dinner is:
Obama................. 8% !!!

Monday, March 8, 2010

Must We Be Forced To Finance Sedition?

MUST WE BE FORCED TO FINANCE SEDITION?

The United States Constitution is the supreme law of the United States. It contains a written order that
the federal system has to guarantee and provide the people a republic as their form of government.
Article IV – Section 4 – U. S. Constitution
Under the guarantee of a republic, the people are the ultimate power. 9th & 10th Amendments – Bill of Rights
In order to be the ultimate power, the people must have a means, in addition to their individual bodily
strength, or power in the voting booth, to maintain and defend the guarantee of a republic.
2nd Amendment – Bill of Rights
The means, necessary to maintain and defend the guarantee of a republic, was wisely written into the
federal Constitution, and is found in the irrevocable first ten amendments, commonly known as the Bill
of Rights. The Bill of Rights has its own history and characteristics, which render it not subject to the
repeal, revoke, or rescind process. The Second Amendment of the Bill of Rights commands: “A well
regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear
arms, shall not be infringed”. 2nd Amendment – Bill of Rights
All treaties made must be in pursuance of the laws within the United States Constitution and the Bill of
Rights. Treaties are valid only if they are “made in pursuance” of the laws within the 1787 Constitution
and those within the 1791 Bill of Rights. A portentous treaty, such as the Small Arms Treaty, is not a
valid treaty as it intends to disarm the people; to eliminate their right to arms; to dissolve their
independence; to alter their authority and operational concepts; to place them under a socialist system;
and deny them and their posterity the rights and blessings of liberty under a republic. Treaties do not
supersede the United States Constitution or the Bill of Rights. Article VI – Paragraph 2 – U. S. Constitution
Socialist countries are not republics. They operate under a different set of political and economic
theories, those which are based upon collectivism, and government control of production and
distribution: government ownership of wealth as in com munism. Webster’s Collegiate Dictionary
Passing federal, state, county or treaty law in the attempt to reconstitute the United States into a
socialistic country; to change its form of government by altering the concepts of a republic and replacing
it with an unauthorized form of government, not of the people’s choosing; to disarm the population; to
deny the people the exercise of their sovereignty and authority; and to gradually work to promote a
collapse of the Constitutional republic is subversive and un‐American activity, punishable by law. It
constitutes serious crime. It is prevalent. This is called sedition! 18 U.S.C.A. Sec. 2384 Black’s Law Dictionary
Why must we be forced to finance sedition and be forced to pay salaries to the transgressors? It is the
duty of all loyal government officials to resist this slow invasion and to protect the people against it.
Article IV ‐ Section 4 U.S. Constitution
Second Amendment Committee P.O. Box 1776 Hanford, California 93232

Wednesday, February 24, 2010

Saturday, February 20, 2010

And You Thought Ron Paul Was Nuts

Well if we had a few more nuts like Ron Paul we wouldn't be in this mess.

I just found this article which is from "Post Politics" and was posted on 1/5/10.

The writer Mr. Kleinheider put me in the Fourth District when I am running in the Seventh District's Republican Party primary.



And You Thought Ron Paul Was Nuts

Monday, February 15, 2010

I'm Going To Be Interviewed On "The Corner"

I will be interviewed on “The Corner.” Tuesday night, February 16 at 7:30 cst.

The website is http://www.talkshoe.com/tc/51074.

Hope you listen.

Sunday, February 14, 2010

Saturday, February 13, 2010

THE LATE, GREAT GLOBAL WARMING SCARE

THE LATE, GREAT GLOBAL WARMING SCARE
By Ben Lieberman, Washington Times coluimnist February 12, 2010
Global-warming skeptics were hit with numerous setbacks over the past
few years -- from a major 2007 U.N. report that seemingly confirmed the
warming crisis, to Al Gore's popularization of this gloomy message
through his book and Oscar-winning documentary, "An Inconvenient Truth."
And let's not forget the shifting political winds that elected a
greener Congress and brought in an administration that made climate
change a priority.
But now those skeptics are facing a new challenge: overconfidence.
That's because everything of late has been breaking their way.
OK, overconfidence may be an exaggeration, but the wheels are really
coming off the global-warming cart.
"Climategate" -- the recent leak of e-mails showing gross misconduct
among scientists with key roles in the U.N. report -- raises serious
questions about how much of the global-warming science we can trust. The
scientists were, after all, manipulating the temperature data to show
more warming and subverting requests by independent researchers to see
the underlying data.
Other scary claims in the U.N. report, such as the assertion that
Himalayan glaciers are on pace to melt completely by 2035, also turned
out to be false and have been retracted recently.
Climategate and other scandals only add to the reasons for doubt. At
the same time, Mr. Gore's many terrifying predictions are not
withstanding the test of time.
His book and movie really played up the supposed link between global
warming and Hurricane Katrina. Unfortunately for the scaremongers (and
fortunately for those who live on the coast) we haven't seen anything
even close to Katrina since. The 2006 through 2008 hurricane seasons
were at or below average, and the 2009 season went down as the weakest in
more than a decade. So much for a global-warming-induced hurricane
trend -- and many other such scares.
Another thing missing from the global-warming crisis? Global
warming. Temperatures have been flat for more than a decade, and 2009
adds one more year to that trend.
Polling shows that the American people increasingly see Mr. Gore (and
others) as the boy who cried wolf, and they are drawing their own
common-sense conclusions. The number who believe global warming is real
is dropping, and the number who consider it a crisis has plummeted.
Also declining is the number of those willing to accept substantially
higher gasoline prices and electric bills -- the intended result of
domestic global-warming bills or international treaties that raise the
price of fossil fuels so we are forced to use less.
Even studies conducted by the Obama administration find reduced
economic activity, higher energy prices and lost jobs from such measures.
In other words, global-warming policy promises plenty of economic pain
for little if any environmental gain -- a hard sell at any time, but
especially now, given the lingering recession.
For all their stated concern for the issue, President Obama and
Congress have an uphill climb to turn this into law. Consider one recent
poll, conducted by the Pew Research Center for the People and the Press,
asking the American people to rank 20 issues in terms of importance.
Global warming came in 20th -- dead last -- while the economy came in
at No. 1. It won't be easy to enact a law or yoke the U.S. to a global
treaty that addresses America's No. 20 priority at the expense of No.
1 -- and do so in an election year.
There is still plenty to worry skeptics. One example: the
Environmental Protection Agency's attempt to impose global-warming policy
through costly regulations.
Also, there's no room for complacency so long as the forces in favor
of global-warming measures remain powerful and persistent. But the
facts -- and the politics on this issue -- are moving away from alarm.
We may look back on 2010 as the year when the great global-warming
scare really started to fade into history.
--Ben Lieberman is senior policy analyst for energy and environment at
the Heritage Foundation.
-----------------------------------
PSEUDO-SCIENTISTS AND CORRUPT SCIENTISTS SCAM
There is a philosophy that some people won't believe evidence when
they don't like what the evidence shows, especially if it disproves what
they want to believe.
There is plenty of evidence to show that global warming is just a
scam. The normal pattern of weather cycles allows one area to
temporarily overheat while another area temporarily overcools, according
to weather reports covering the past 150 years.
When is the Global Warming going to happen that Al Gore has been
preaching about the past 16 years since his book "Earth In The Balance"
was published in 1992. Perhaps Al Gore can't believe the weather
observations showing evidence of Global Cooling.
Man-made Global Warming is still touted by scientists beyond their
expertise and scientists who really know better but have an entirely
different agenda such as research grant money -- or the Marxists ideas of
redistribution of wealth, harming capitalism, population control, and
One-World Government. --REAL NEWS Editor thenewsman@ij.net

Saturday, January 30, 2010

Saturday, January 23, 2010

I Like Guns - Steve Lee

Citizen's Refresher Course

1. "Those who hammer their guns into plows will plow for those who do not."
~Thomas Jefferson

2. Those who trade liberty for security have neither.
~ John Adams

3. Free men do not ask permission to bear arms.

4. An armed man is a citizen - - An unarmed man is a subject.

5. Only a government that is afraid of its citizens tries to control them.


6. Gun control is not about guns; it's about control.
7. You only have the rights you are willing to fight for.

8. Know guns, know peace, know safety. No guns, no peace, no safety.

9. You don't shoot to kill; you shoot to stay alive.

10. Assault is a behavior, not a device.

11. 64,999,987 firearms owners killed no one yesterday.

12. The United States Constitution (c) 1791. All Rights Reserved.

13. The Second Amendment is in place in case the politicians ignore the others.

14. What part of 'shall not be infringed' do you NOT understand?


15. Guns have only two enemies; rust and politicians.


16. When you remove the people's right to bear arms, you create slaves.


17. The American Revolution would never have happened with gun control.

Friday, January 22, 2010

What Else Is New


"I think we have more machinery of government than is necessary,

too many parasites living on the labor of the industrious."


Thomas Jefferson, letter to William Ludlow, 1824

Monday, January 18, 2010

Another Great Quote

"All tyranny needs to gain a foothold is for
people of
good conscience to
remain silent"
-- Thomas Jefferson

Sunday, January 17, 2010

Are You A Leader?????

Are you a leader?????

There’s one sure way to find out.

One: Go to a public meting where the officials are discussing the solution to some problem.

Any Problem.

Two: When it’s time for questions and answers ask the following question and make the following comment.

“Sir if this program is implemented will it increase the size, cost, reach and power of the government?

We have too much government now!!!


When the meeting adjourns listen to the crowd of people who surround you.
They are ready for your leadership.

Go to my website, www.ladner4congress.com

And find out what to do next.

Wednesday, January 6, 2010

The True Purpose of the Second Amendment

Question
Why was the Second Amendment put into the Constitution?
Answer
So that we could protect ourselves from the government!
Other measures to protect US from the government were:
1) The Fedgov could have no army in peacetime.
2) Fedgov could not quarter troops in our houses
3) Fedgov could send troops into a state only with the consent of the state government or during an insurrection.
Question
Without an army how could the federal government defend the country against invasion and war?
Answer
By calling out the militia: Each state had an organized militia under the control of the state government (the officers were trained by the federal government).
Question
What was to prevent the state government from using the militia against its own citizens?
Answer
To regulate that is to control the militia the Founder's said "Arm the entire population"
That is the Second Amendment.
In the "Federalist Papers" the founders asserted that the combined militias of the states would be stronger than any force the Federal Government could raise, and by the same reasoning an armed population would be stronger than any militia a State Government could use against its citizens.
The Second Amendment has nothing whatsoever to do with hunting, sportsmanship or target shooting:
The claim that it does has been made by people who want to exclude the ordinary citizens.
(Who are not hunters, sportsmen or target shooters) from the debate.
This allows those promoters to agree to a series of compromises which over time will disarm the people and leave US at the mercy of the government.
If you are a gun owner in America,
vote for Leonard " Lenny" Ladner for the House of Representatives, Seventh District of Tennessee.
Please visit me on the web at www.Ladner4congress.com

Friday, January 1, 2010

James Madison, Federalist #46

"Besides the advantage of being armed, which the Americans possess over the people of almost every other nation, the existence of subordinate governments, to which the people are attached and by which the militia officers are appointed, forms a barrier against the enterprises of ambition, more insurmountable than any which a simple government of any form can admit of."
James Madison, Federalist No. 46

James Madison, Federalist #46

"Besides the advantage of being armed, which the Americans possess over the people of almost every other nation, the existence of subordinate governments, to which the people are attached and by which the militia officers are appointed, forms a barrier against the enterprises of ambition, more insurmountable than any which a simple government of any form can admit of."


~ James Madison, Federalist No. 46